19.9.07

Funny & Interesting People Part 1: Wesley Morgan on spending the summer in Iraq and what war sounds like.


I have asked Wesley Morgan, sophomore at Princeton, to write us a guest blog entry. Below is a brief interview with him, and then his essay. Why Wesley? Well, he is a generally fascinating kid who spent part of the summer in Iraq with the US military’s top dog General Patraeus.

Cameron: You had a pretty amazing summer. Tell me what you did.
Wesley: After my freshman year at Princeton ended in June I went to Iraq for the summer as a reporter.
C: That’s very brave of you, or crazy. What inspired you to go?
W: I’ve been interested in counterinsurgency for most of my life.
C: Not many people can say that, especially not many twenty year olds.
W: I’m one of the lucky few then. Anyhow, about a year ago, I interviewed Gen. David Petraeus for my school newspaper, the Daily Princetonian. [Petraeus is an alum.] He liked my questions. And when he found out that I’m also an Army ROTC cadet, he stayed in touch.
C: Are we talking about General Petraeus, the guy that the New York Times is always talking about? The guy in charge in Iraq?
W: Yeah, that’s the one. Last winter, after he took command of U.S. forces in Iraq, Gen. Petraeus suggested that I come to Iraq for the summer, and I of course jumped at the chance. My search for funding for the trip led me to Bill Roggio, a conservative blogger and embed who generously backed my project and helped me get credentialed as an embedded journalist. So, after working at a DC think tank for the first half of the summer, I flew into Kuwait in late July for what ended up being a pretty phenomenal trip.
C: And you wrote all about your experience, right?
W: I’ve written a lot about the military details and lessons learned from the trip at my own blog.
C: Tell me a little about what you learned and the piece you wrote for me.
W: Well Iraq is a fascinating place, so completely different from the States or any other country I’ve ever visited that I hardly know where to start – going chronologically or even just describing incidents that happened seems like it wouldn’t convey what the country and the soldiers are like. Since the last few days on my trip I’ve been thinking about how to write about Iraq through a different lens, one that would seem kind of out of place on my own blog maybe, but that would convey a sense of the place. Since you’re so artsy and original I think this blog is the place for it.
C: I’m flattered! Thanks for talking to me.
W: No problem. Thank you.

Here is the essay Wesley wrote for Funny and Interesting:

How I will remember Iraq

Before I left for Iraq, a soldier I know told me to choose carefully what book I brought along, because I’d always remember that as what I was reading when I first saw a war zone. I reread bits and pieces of Gen. Petraeus’s and Gen. Mattis’s counterinsurgency field manual while I was over there, and I did finish Harry Potter, but there really wasn’t a lot of time for reading (except the endless hours of waiting for flights, which I think are better spent talking to soldiers). There are movies and TV shows playing in every waiting area or lounge and on every forward operating base, but more often than not those just seem jarring and weird – watching episodes of Alias while waiting in a cavernous hanger, for instance, or a pirated copy of Transformers in the basement of a combat outpost between patrols, seemed strange and out of place, and not something that will stick with me as symbolic of the experience. What I will remember is the music I listened to here, and probably always associate a few songs with the experience.

A few months back, Tom Ricks wrote about soldiers’ music in a short piece in the Washington Post, and one the songs he mentioned I actually did hear a bunch of times. You know that song “America, Fuck Yeah!” from Team America: World Police, I’m not sure exactly how many times, but I heard soldiers playing that before or after patrols, either on speakers or once when a soldier gave me one of his iPod’s earbuds. Also, I probably played the “Army Strong” music from Army recruiting ads (yes, I do have it) a hundred times because I listen to it when I need to stay awake and write, which was all the time in Iraq, and it was also the background music to a slideshow that an infantry unit called the Black Lions was working on while I was with them. Those are both very hooah, Army songs, even though the Team America one is obviously tongue-in-cheek, and I heard them a lot, but even they don’t really seem like Iraq to me. They seem superficial somehow, and when I think back over the sounds I associate with the trip, they’re really not the first things that come up. Instead, two other, much more random songs do.

The first is a song called “Older” by Colbie Caillat, some new singer I know nothing about, which I got from the iTunes “new music” thing right before I left and which somehow copied itself into my computer three times, meaning that it is constantly coming up on shuffle. That song is completely un-Iraq-like – as one soldier told me with a combination of disgust and confusion when he saw it playing, “I can’t believe you’re listening to that queer-ass shit again,” which is a fair description, at least in Army vocabulary. But I heard it so many times while writing or updating maps and data that it was stuck in my head for a good week in Baghdad, and sort of still is. That might make for weird memories – associating a sappy, incomprehensible pop song with the sights and smells of Baghdad – but it’s true. I wonder whether that association will stick.

Most of all, though, the music that says “Iraq 2007” to me is “Mad World” by Gary Jules (I had to look up the name). It starts, “All around me are familiar faces, worn out places,” and you might know it from the movie “Donnie Darko.” When I first heard it in Baghdad, it took me a good hour to realize that that’s where I recognized it from. Anyway, sometime in my second week in Iraq, a Spanish journalist named David Beriain showed me a phenomenally powerful slideshow of his time with the 1-4 Cav in Dora, with that song in the background, and it has stuck like epoxy.

I’ve been back for two weeks now, and I still play that song whenever I’m writing about Iraq, because it brings back a vividness to the experiences and recollections like nothing else. I’d probably only heard it once or twice before I got here, but now it won’t go away. In Iraq, it was my brain’s default background noise whenever I spaced out from tiredness or was just trying to piece together everything I’d seen, heard, and smelled on a given day. When my mind went blank staring out the window of a Black Hawk, or sitting in the sweaty hold of a Stryker, I heard that song. When I sat down to write on military computers and didn’t have my own music, I heard it the whole time. It was running through my blank mind the first time my vehicle was ever shot at, and again the last time.

Two weeks ago, on the flight out of Kuwait, as I drifted in and out of consciousness while trying to run through the five weeks in Iraq in my mind, that song was just there, in the background, playing over a fuzzy mental montage of carbine-toting, grey-clad soldiers, crowds of hostile Shia pilgrims, an Iraqi cop with shattered and bloody legs, alert officers at intelligence briefings, frightened prisoners, and colorful reporters. The hundreds of new military and civilian faces I saw in Iraq, the least familiar environment I’ve ever been in, were anything but familiar, but when my mind was drifting sleepily back over all those faces on the plane ride – and now when I try to write about it – that was what I heard.

There’s something about that song. Maybe that’s why David chose it for his tribute to the cav soldiers he knew in Dora. Capt. Grim and the snipers on Haifa Street, the hateful glares of the Sadrist marchers, Gen. Petraeus with his intense energy and endless questions, the eccentric interpreters, the brilliant Lt. Col. Peterson, the journalists I met, the black-robed expressionless women, the quietly weeping sergeants at the Stryker memorial service, Lt. Col. Frank and his infantrymen, the soldiers from Southie in that Manchu infantry platoon, the blindfolded Mahdi Army detainees at a south Baghdad outpost, the eerie green drone feed of insurgents being reduced to chunks of meat by an Apache, the Sadrist intelligence source coldly giving us targeting intel on dozens of his comrades for a stack of cash, the Iraqi policeman washing the blood from his hands at Kalsu, the pride in the eyes of the Black Lions. All of those are, in a way, even if I saw them only once, familiar faces, faces I doubt I’ll completely forget, ever.

The Mad World Video--


Some of Wesley's Photos--



To read more about Wesley’s experiences go to his blog.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you for this first person account.

Jerry@LIM said...

Thank you for posting this piece Cameron. I am glad that I got to read it, I never would have if you hadn't posted it because it's not really my bag. I love your blog and always read it when you post new stuff, I only wish you posted more often!

Stefano said...

A study published by The Lancet in October 2006 concluded that about 600,000 Iraqis had died due to the war during 39 months of conflict: surveyed people indicated U.S. troops and their allied forces as responsible for 31% of the murders
(http://www.thelancet.com/webfiles/images/
journals/lancet/s0140673606694919.pdf).
The U.S. and British governments, dismissing this study (Bush had spread the figure of 30,000 deaths in December 2005), offered no valid reasons for rejecting these findings, and they ignored the fact that they had sponsored identical studies in other war areas like Afghanistan, Kosovo etc.
(http://www.democracynow.org/
article.pl?sid=06/10/12/145222).
The likelihood of such a disaster had been indicated in advance, nevertheless USA opted for invasion
(http://www.medact.org/
article_publications.php?articleID=152).
Sadly a new survey (September 2007) done by the British polling agency ORB confirms the Lancet survey and suggests that more than 1,000,000 Iraqis have been murdered since 2003
(http://www.opinion.co.uk/
Newsroom_details.aspx?NewsId=78).
According to July 2007 Oxfam and NCCI report eight million Iraqis – nearly one in three - are in need of emergency aid. In detail:

Four million Iraqis – 15% - regularly cannot buy enough to eat.
70% are without adequate water supplies, compared to 50% in 2003.
28% of children are malnourished, compared to 19% before the 2003 invasion.
92% of Iraqi children suffer learning problems, mostly due to the climate of fear.
More than two million people – mostly women and children - have been displaced inside Iraq.
A further two million Iraqis have become refugees, mainly in Syria and Jordan.
(http://www.oxfam.org/en/news/2007/
pr070730_iraq_humanitarian_crisis)

How can we look at Iraq through a different lens? I don't know... frankly I think that the usual one works quite well: Gen. Petraeus is the dude in charge of raging through Iraq to perpetuate Western control over global oil supplies.
The most suitable soundtrack for Iraqi hell? A dead march, I suppose.

Stefano

Jen said...

Stefano thank you for the real info. General PetraAss is more suitable name. Princeton University should be ashamed of him.

Anonymous said...

I am and was against the war in Iraq. That doesn't mean it isn't interesting for me to hear a first hand account of what it's like over there or appreciate the work of a General who was thrown in after the war had already started. I think that it is important to realize the death toll and the mistake Iraq was. But it is equally important to understanding now that we are in a war what that war is like and how it is overseen. I'm sure Patreaus (is that how you spell his name?) wants to get out of Iraq but I doubt it's an easy job.

Stefano said...

Anonymous, the death toll is what war is (like) and how it's overseen. Of course there's nothing wrong if you like Wes' report.
Invasion of Iraq was driven largely by oil: what really matters to Bush is to control oil supplies, to establish Iraqi leading classes that are sensitive to western economic demands, to secure contracts for American companies that pursue government work in the occupied territories (to build, operate and maintain warehouses destined for military equipment, for example). Whatever the cost: so Iraqis keep on dying and Americans go on paying. Given this strategy different military approaches to Iraq occupation are usually unimportant details. However let's give a look to Petraeus's work from the Internet media perspective.
After the 2003 invasion Gen Petraeus was responsible for north-central Iraq: backed by the overwhelming presence of the 101st Airborne, he "distinguished himself in Mosul with his hearts-and-minds approach" ( http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3056/
counterinsurgency_101/).
The organization of Iraqi army and police was his responsibility from June 2004 to September 2005; despite his optimistic report, dated September 2004 and published by the Washington Post( http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
articles/A49283-2004Sep25.html), the outcome of his efforts was a failure. In May 2004 the project of a "third force" of highly trained police commando units (Emergency Response Units) was launched. "The trainings began under General David Petreaus as an effort to bolster security in Iraq, and soon evolved into a system for providing support to the deeply sectarian Ministry of the Interior" ( http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=14700). According to a reportage by Peter Maass, Gen. Petraeus also supported the Special Police Commandos, led by ex-Ba'athist Gen Adnan: Maass witnessed many cases in which the Commandos (then National Police under the Ministry of the Interior) abused prisoners
(http://www.petermaass.com/core.cfm?
p=1&mag=123&magtype=1).
A September 2007 report about the Iraqi security forces, prepared by a commission of retired senior U.S. military officers, described Iraqi army as ineffective; the same commission recommended that the national police force, controlled by the Ministry of the Interior but "riddled with sectarianism and corruption", be disbanded.
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content
/article/2007/09/05/AR2007090501282.html).
And that's about "missing in action" weapons: "The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005", that is "30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops [...] The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq."
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content
/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299.html)
In September 2007 Gen. Petraeus seemed to be "incomprehensibly" in the dark about the proportions of the Iraqi massacre and preferred submitting fishy numbers about a supposed recent drop in violence in the occupied territories ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content
/article/2007/09/05/AR2007090502466.html).
So Gen. Petraeus is a brilliant Princeton alumna who possesses great political skills (when he's backed by the 101st Airborne) and likes Sunnis and ex-Ba'athists (in a country where Curds and Shiites are predominant); tempted by the "salvadorization" of Iraq, he hates to account for the weapons he receives and he's little concerned in Iraqi civilians' lot. Do you "appreciate" his work?

Let's focus on most relevant things: where's Cameron? I'm worried, did she join the Army? Petraeus, dismiss Cameron Russell! when she signed up she was beside herself, intoxicated by the controversial eau de parfum Angel by Thierry Mugler.
What about a petition to have her back?

N° 1

Name: Stefano

From: Italy

Why do you want Cam back?
"Cos she's smart and ironic
(OK... cute dimples and
nice overall looks as well)"

...

Anonymous said...

lllllllllloveyou cam

Wesley Morgan said...

Cameron in the Army - that I would love to see! Haha!

Stefano: I (same Wes who wrote this little piece) would be happy to discuss Gen. Petraeus's record with you more privately - some of those are fair criticisms, but some are not. Wesleysmorgan@gmail.com. Let's let Cam's blog stay about the funny and the interesting, not war statistics.

Stefano said...

Wesley, thanks for your reply, I'm looking forward to read your remarks. I'll contact you very soon.
About the pertinence of war statistics, it's for Cameron to decide, maybe she'll enlighten us.
This blog touches also thorny stuff, reconstruction after Katrina, immigration laws etc. Have a look to Cam's Comic Economics post: she deals with a burning matter in a very sweet way and she's able to make it intelligible to a child (a rare talent), but the message is tough: goods and capital circulate freely but labour does not and that's not right; even more so, I add, no country should be allowed to have access to resources (e.g. Iraq oil) through coercive means, contribute to a slaughter, cause war and labour out-migration and then take no notice of the civilian deads, of emigrants and refugees. I get the "MTV mood" and the alternative spirit of your report, Wesley, it doesn't shock me, light and serious can coexist, but the main mass media coverage of Iraq war neither provides substantial information nor stresses the point of invasion legitimacy. Beside your light piece I just provide the often neglected numbers of the tragedy in progress, so that everybody can realize what your perspective is alternative to.
My second post is another story, it's just an answer to Anonymous' idealization of Petraeus; however founded on reliable sources, my little research doesn't claim to strike the balance of Petraeus' skills and work: my conclusion about him is partly satirical. As I've already written, Petraeus' "touch" is not that relevant: whatever the general in charge of Iraq may be, the White House aim, a protectorate on Iraq, is secured. Anyhow I'd like to know your objections, Wesley.
The following link seems to be another first person account of occupied Iraq: http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/
Just a note about my harsh tone: it's all about passion for this subject and about necessity of being precise and sticking to facts; I want neither to sound offensive to anyone nor to discourage replies.

Molly said...

This was really interesting and I know it is a real life story. I am glad I was able to meet you Wesley. Also I read your other blog about the Marines which of course was awesome. Anyway keep up the good work!

Semper Fidelis!
USMC